Barriers to opioid use disorder treatment: A comparison of self-reported information from social media with barriers found in literature.

Introduction: Medications such as buprenorphine and methadone are effective for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), but many patients face barriers related to treatment and access. We analyzed two sources of data-social media and published literature-to categorize and quantify such barriers. Methods: In this mixed methods study, we analyzed social media (Reddit) posts from three OUD-related forums (subreddits): r/suboxone, r/Methadone, and r/naltrexone. We applied natural language processing to identify posts relevant to treatment barriers, categorized them into insurance- and non-insurance-related, and manually subcategorized them into fine-grained topics. For comparison, we used substance use-, OUD- and barrier-related keywords to identify relevant articles from PubMed published between 2006 and 2022. We searched publications for language expressing fear of barriers, and hesitation or disinterest in medication treatment because of barriers, paying particular attention to the affected population groups described. Results: On social media, the top three insurance-related barriers included having no insurance (22.5%), insurance not covering OUD treatment (24.7%), and general difficulties of using insurance for OUD treatment (38.2%); while the top two non-insurance-related barriers included stigma (47.6%), and financial difficulties (26.2%). For published literature, stigma was the most prominently reported barrier, occurring in 78.9% of the publications reviewed, followed by financial and/or logistical issues to receiving medication treatment (73.7%), gender-specific barriers (36.8%), and fear (31.5%). Conclusion: The stigma associated with OUD and/or seeking treatment and insurance/cost are the two most common types of barriers reported in the two sources combined. Harm reduction efforts addressing barriers to recovery may benefit from leveraging multiple data sources.

Recruitment and retention in mobile application-based intervention studies: a critical synopsis of challenges and opportunities.

Use of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) is becoming increasingly popular for the management of chronic illnesses, but mHealth-based intervention studies often have limitations associated with subject recruitment and retention. In this synopsis, we focus on targeted aspects of mHealth-based intervention studies, specifically: (i) subject recruitment, (ii) cohort sizes, and (iii) retention rates. We used the Google Scholar (meta-search) and Galileo search engines to identify sample articles focusing on mHealth apps and interventions published between 2010 and 2020 and selected 21 papers for detailed review. Most studies recruited relatively small cohorts (minimum: 20, maximum: 510). Retention rates had high variance with only five studies managing >80% subject retention throughout the study duration, 10.4% being the lowest. Eighty-five percent of the studies expressed concerns regarding study duration, app usage, and lack of proper implementation. The use of mHealth interventions generally yielded positive outcomes, but most studies discussed facing challenges associated with recruitment and retention. There is a clear need to identify strategies for recruiting larger cohorts and improving retention rates, and ultimately increasing the reliability of mHealth app-based intervention studies. We advise that potential underutilized opportunities lie at the intersection of mHealth and social media to address the limitations identified in the synopsis.

Multimodal Assessment of Schizophrenia and Depression Utilizing Video, Acoustic, Locomotor, Electroencephalographic, and Heart Rate Technology: Protocol for an Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Current standards of psychiatric assessment and diagnostic evaluation rely primarily on the clinical subjective interpretation of a patient's outward manifestations of their internal state. While psychometric tools can help to evaluate these behaviors more systematically, the tools still rely on the clinician's interpretation of what are frequently nuanced speech and behavior patterns. With advances in computing power, increased availability of clinical data, and improving resolution of recording and sensor hardware (including acoustic, video, accelerometer, infrared, and other modalities), researchers have begun to demonstrate the feasibility of cutting-edge technologies in aiding the assessment of psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: We present a research protocol that utilizes facial expression, eye gaze, voice and speech, locomotor, heart rate, and electroencephalography monitoring to assess schizophrenia symptoms and to distinguish patients with schizophrenia from those with other psychiatric disorders and control subjects. METHODS: We plan to recruit three outpatient groups: (1) 50 patients with schizophrenia, (2) 50 patients with unipolar major depressive disorder, and (3) 50 individuals with no psychiatric history. Using an internally developed semistructured interview, psychometrically validated clinical outcome measures, and a multimodal sensing system utilizing video, acoustic, actigraphic, heart rate, and electroencephalographic sensors, we aim to evaluate the system's capacity in classifying subjects (schizophrenia, depression, or control), to evaluate the system's sensitivity to within-group symptom severity, and to determine if such a system can further classify variations in disorder subtypes. RESULTS: Data collection began in July 2020 and is expected to continue through December 2022. CONCLUSIONS: If successful, this study will help advance current progress in developing state-of-the-art technology to aid clinical psychiatric assessment and treatment. If our findings suggest that these technologies are capable of resolving diagnoses and symptoms to the level of current psychometric testing and clinician judgment, we would be among the first to develop a system that can eventually be used by clinicians to more objectively diagnose and assess schizophrenia and depression with the possibility of less risk of bias. Such a tool has the potential to improve accessibility to care; to aid clinicians in objectively evaluating diagnoses, severity of symptoms, and treatment efficacy through time; and to reduce treatment-related morbidity. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/36417.

Reddit discussions about buprenorphine associated precipitated withdrawal in the era of fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Induction of buprenorphine, an evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), has been reported to be difficult for people with heavy use of fentanyl, the most prevalent opioid in many areas of the country. In this population, precipitated opioid withdrawal (POW) may occur even after individuals have completed a period of opioid abstinence prior to induction. Our objective was to study potential associations between fentanyl, buprenorphine induction, and POW, using social media data. METHODS: This is a mixed methods study of data from seven opioid-related forums (subreddits) on Reddit. We retrieved publicly available data from the subreddits via an application programming interface, and applied natural language processing to identify subsets of posts relevant to buprenorphine induction, POW, and fentanyl and analogs (F&A). We computed mention frequencies for keywords/phrases of interest specified by our medical toxicology experts. We further conducted manual, qualitative, and thematic analyses of automatically identified posts to characterize the information presented. Results: In 267,136 retrieved posts, substantial increases in mentions of F&A (3 in 2013 to 3870 in 2020) and POW (2 in 2012 to 332 in 2020) were observed. F&A mentions from 2013 to 2021 were strongly correlated with mentions of POW (Spearman's ρ: 0.882; p = .0016), and mentions of the Bernese method (BM), a microdosing induction strategy (Spearman's ρ: 0.917; p = .0005). Manual review of 384 POW- and 106 BM-mentioning posts revealed that common discussion themes included "specific triggers of POW" (55.1%), "buprenorphine dosing strategies" (38.2%) and "experiences of OUD" (36.1%). Many reported experiencing POW despite prolonged opioid abstinence periods, and recommended induction via microdosing, including specifically via the BM. CONCLUSIONS: Reddit subscribers often associate POW with F&A use and describe self-managed buprenorphine induction strategies involving microdosing to avoid POW. Further objective studies in patients with fentanyl use and OUD initiating buprenorphine are needed to corroborate these findings.HIGHLIGHTSIncrease in mentions of precipitated opioid withdrawal (POW) on Reddit from 2012 to 2021 was associated with the increase in fentanyl and analog mentions.Experiences of precipitated opioid withdrawal (POW) were described by individuals despite reporting prolonged periods of abstinence compared to standard buprenorphine induction protocols.People with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) on Reddit are using and recommending microdosing strategies with buprenorphine to avoid POW.People who used fentanyl report experiencing POW following statistically longer periods of abstinence than people who use heroin.

Developing an Automatic System for Classifying Chatter About Health Services on Twitter: Case Study for Medicaid.

BACKGROUND: The wide adoption of social media in daily life renders it a rich and effective resource for conducting near real-time assessments of consumers' perceptions of health services. However, its use in these assessments can be challenging because of the vast amount of data and the diversity of content in social media chatter. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and evaluate an automatic system involving natural language processing and machine learning to automatically characterize user-posted Twitter data about health services using Medicaid, the single largest source of health coverage in the United States, as an example. METHODS: We collected data from Twitter in two ways: via the public streaming application programming interface using Medicaid-related keywords (Corpus 1) and by using the website's search option for tweets mentioning agency-specific handles (Corpus 2). We manually labeled a sample of tweets in 5 predetermined categories or other and artificially increased the number of training posts from specific low-frequency categories. Using the manually labeled data, we trained and evaluated several supervised learning algorithms, including support vector machine, random forest (RF), naïve Bayes, shallow neural network (NN), k-nearest neighbor, bidirectional long short-term memory, and bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT). We then applied the best-performing classifier to the collected tweets for postclassification analyses to assess the utility of our methods. RESULTS: We manually annotated 11,379 tweets (Corpus 1: 9179; Corpus 2: 2200) and used 7930 (69.7%) for training, 1449 (12.7%) for validation, and 2000 (17.6%) for testing. A classifier based on BERT obtained the highest accuracies (81.7%, Corpus 1; 80.7%, Corpus 2) and F1 scores on consumer feedback (0.58, Corpus 1; 0.90, Corpus 2), outperforming the second best classifiers in terms of accuracy (74.6%, RF on Corpus 1; 69.4%, RF on Corpus 2) and F1 score on consumer feedback (0.44, NN on Corpus 1; 0.82, RF on Corpus 2). Postclassification analyses revealed differing intercorpora distributions of tweet categories, with political (400778/628411, 63.78%) and consumer feedback (15073/27337, 55.14%) tweets being the most frequent for Corpus 1 and Corpus 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The broad and variable content of Medicaid-related tweets necessitates automatic categorization to identify topic-relevant posts. Our proposed system presents a feasible solution for automatic categorization and can be deployed and generalized for health service programs other than Medicaid. Annotated data and methods are available for future studies.

Methadone and suboxone® mentions on twitter: thematic and sentiment analysis.

BACKGROUND: According to the latest medical evidence, Methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone (Suboxone®) are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). While the evidence basis for the use of these medications is favorable, less is known about the perceptions of the general public about them. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use Twitter to assess the public perceptions about methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone, and to compare their discussion contents based on themes/topics, subthemes, and sentiment. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive analysis of a small and automatic analysis of a large volume of microposts ("tweets") that mentioned "methadone" or "suboxone". In the manual analysis, we categorized the tweets into themes and subthemes, as well as by sentiment and personal experience, and compared the information posted about these two medications. We performed automatic topic modeling and sentiment analysis over large volumes of posts and compared the outputs to those from the manual analyses. RESULTS: We manually analyzed 900 tweets, most of which related to access (15.3% for methadone; 14.3% for buprenorphine-naloxone), stigma (17.0%; 15.5%), and OUD treatment (12.8%; 15.6%). Only a small proportion of tweets (16.4% for Suboxone® and 9.3% for methadone) expressed positive sentiments about the medications, with few tweets describing personal experiences. Tweets mentioning both medications primarily discussed MOUD broadly, rather than comparing the two medications directly. Automatic topic modeling revealed topics from the larger dataset that corresponded closely to the manually identified themes, but sentiment analysis did not reveal any notable differences in chatter regarding the two medications. CONCLUSIONS: Twitter content about methadone and Suboxone® is similar, with the same major themes and similar sub-themes. Despite the proven effectiveness of these medications, there was little dialogue related to their benefits or efficacy in the treatment of OUD. Perceptions of these medications may contribute to their underutilization in combatting OUDs.

Self-reported COVID-19 symptoms on Twitter: an analysis and a research resource.

OBJECTIVE: To mine Twitter and quantitatively analyze COVID-19 symptoms self-reported by users, compare symptom distributions across studies, and create a symptom lexicon for future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrieved tweets using COVID-19-related keywords, and performed semiautomatic filtering to curate self-reports of positive-tested users. We extracted COVID-19-related symptoms mentioned by the users, mapped them to standard concept IDs in the Unified Medical Language System, and compared the distributions to those reported in early studies from clinical settings. RESULTS: We identified 203 positive-tested users who reported 1002 symptoms using 668 unique expressions. The most frequently-reported symptoms were fever/pyrexia (66.1%), cough (57.9%), body ache/pain (42.7%), fatigue (42.1%), headache (37.4%), and dyspnea (36.3%) amongst users who reported at least 1 symptom. Mild symptoms, such as anosmia (28.7%) and ageusia (28.1%), were frequently reported on Twitter, but not in clinical studies. CONCLUSION: The spectrum of COVID-19 symptoms identified from Twitter may complement those identified in clinical settings.